Busabase vs Omnigent vs Sim
A side by side look at Busabase, Omnigent and Sim: pricing, features and what each one is best for.
All comparisons
| Visit Busabase | Visit Omnigent | Visit Sim | |
|---|---|---|---|
| What it costs | |||
| Pricing | Freemium | Open source | Freemium |
| Pricing details | The MIT-licensed engine is free forever when self-hosted, with no seat limit. Busabase Cloud is free for up to 3 seats per space, then Plus at $12 per seat a month ($10 billed yearly, $120 a year) and Pro at $24 per seat a month ($20 yearly, $240 a year). Enterprise is contact-sales. | Free and Apache-2.0 licensed, installed with a shell script from omnigent.ai or through uv, pip or Homebrew, with macOS, iOS and Android apps alongside. There is no pricing page and no commercial tier. The project describes itself as alpha, and support runs through Discord. | Free forever tier with 1,000 monthly credits - Pro $25 per user/month billed monthly - Max $100 per user/month billed monthly - Enterprise custom - the Apache-2.0 codebase can be self-hosted at no cost |
| Free option | Free tier | Free tier | Free tier |
| Plans |
|
|
|
| What it is | |||
| What it does | Busabase keeps what AI agents produce as structured records in shared spaces with a human review queue. MIT-licensed, self-hostable or run as a cloud service. | An Apache-2.0 meta-harness that puts one layer over Claude Code, Codex, Pi and your own agents, adding spend caps, sandboxing and shared live sessions. | Apache-2.0 workspace for building agent workflows on a visual canvas, with a knowledge base, structured tables, shared files and end-to-end execution logs. |
| Platform | Web | Not available | Web |
| The details | |||
| GitHub stars | 506stars | 10,376stars | 29,435stars |
| Language | TypeScript | Python | TypeScript |
| License | MIT License | Apache License 2.0 | Apache License 2.0 |
| Last commit | 12 Oct 2026 | 30 Sept 2026 | 19 Aug 2026 |
What it costs
- Pricing
- Freemium
- Pricing details
- The MIT-licensed engine is free forever when self-hosted, with no seat limit. Busabase Cloud is free for up to 3 seats per space, then Plus at $12 per seat a month ($10 billed yearly, $120 a year) and Pro at $24 per seat a month ($20 yearly, $240 a year). Enterprise is contact-sales.
- Free option
- Free tier
- Plans
- Free$0/mo
- Plus$12/mo
- Pro$24/mo
- EnterpriseContact sales
What it is
- What it does
- Busabase keeps what AI agents produce as structured records in shared spaces with a human review queue. MIT-licensed, self-hostable or run as a cloud service.
- Platform
- Web
The details
- GitHub stars
- 506stars
- Language
- TypeScript
- License
- MIT License
- Last commit
- 12 Oct 2026
What it costs
- Pricing
- Open source
- Pricing details
- Free and Apache-2.0 licensed, installed with a shell script from omnigent.ai or through uv, pip or Homebrew, with macOS, iOS and Android apps alongside. There is no pricing page and no commercial tier. The project describes itself as alpha, and support runs through Discord.
- Free option
- Free tier
- Plans
- Free (Apache-2.0, self-hosted)$0/mo
What it is
- What it does
- An Apache-2.0 meta-harness that puts one layer over Claude Code, Codex, Pi and your own agents, adding spend caps, sandboxing and shared live sessions.
- Platform
- Not available
The details
- GitHub stars
- 10,376stars
- Language
- Python
- License
- Apache License 2.0
- Last commit
- 30 Sept 2026
What it costs
- Pricing
- Freemium
- Pricing details
- Free forever tier with 1,000 monthly credits - Pro $25 per user/month billed monthly - Max $100 per user/month billed monthly - Enterprise custom - the Apache-2.0 codebase can be self-hosted at no cost
- Free option
- Free tier
- Plans
- Free$0/mo
- Pro$25/mo
- Max$100/mo
- EnterpriseContact sales
What it is
- What it does
- Apache-2.0 workspace for building agent workflows on a visual canvas, with a knowledge base, structured tables, shared files and end-to-end execution logs.
- Platform
- Web
The details
- GitHub stars
- 29,435stars
- Language
- TypeScript
- License
- Apache License 2.0
- Last commit
- 19 Aug 2026
Read the full reviews
What each one is actually like to use, tested by hand rather than summarised from the vendor’s own page.
