Greptile
AI code review with full codebase context
About Greptile
Greptile is an AI code reviewer whose defining choice is that it reads the whole codebase before reviewing a diff. Most automated review tools look at the changed lines and reason locally, which catches style problems and obvious bugs but misses the class of defect that actually causes incidents: a change that is perfectly correct in isolation and wrong given something three files away. Full-repository context is what lets a reviewer notice that.
That difference shows up in the kind of comment it leaves. Local review produces observations about the patch. Contextual review produces observations about the system, such as a function whose contract is being violated by a caller the author did not look at, or a pattern that the rest of the codebase deliberately avoids. It is priced per seat with a credit allowance rather than per pull request, which suits teams whose review volume is uneven week to week, and there is a free tier for evaluating it on real work before committing. Review has become the bottleneck in most teams that adopted coding agents, since generation is now cheap and the reading is not, which is the pressure this category exists to relieve.
Connect a repository and Greptile indexes it, building the context that distinguishes it from diff-only tools. From then on it reviews pull requests as they open, leaving comments inline where a human reviewer would. Because it holds the wider codebase, its comments can reference relationships beyond the diff rather than treating the patch as self-contained. Each seat comes with a monthly credit allowance, and additional credits are available at a flat rate when a heavy month runs past it, so an unusual sprint does not require a plan change. The free tier lets a team run it against real pull requests before paying, which matters in this category because the only meaningful evaluation is whether the comments are worth reading on your own code. It is designed to complement human review rather than replace it, handling the mechanical pass so people spend attention on design.
- •Full Codebase Indexing - Reviews with knowledge of the entire repository, not only the diff
- •Cross-file Reasoning - Catches defects that are only visible when the change is read against code elsewhere
- •Inline Pull Request Comments - Feedback where a human reviewer would leave it
- •Per-seat with Credits - 50 credits included per seat each month, absorbing uneven review volume
- •Overflow Pricing - Additional credits at $1 each rather than forcing a tier upgrade
- •Free Tier - Evaluate on real pull requests before paying
- •Complements Human Review - Handles the mechanical pass so reviewers spend attention on design
Teams where pull requests queue because the people qualified to review them are the same people shipping features. That describes most engineering teams, and it describes them more acutely since coding agents started producing more diffs per engineer. Greptile suits codebases large enough that no single reviewer holds the whole thing in their head, since that is exactly where full-repository context pays. It works best as a first pass rather than a gate, catching the mechanical issues so human review starts at the design question. Small teams on a small codebase will see less benefit, because the context advantage matters least when everyone already knows every file.
Pricing
$0 - $30/mo
- Starter$0/mo
- Pro$30/mo
- EnterpriseContact sales
From the vendor pricing page, 2026-09-21
