CodeRabbit vs Greptile
Both post review comments on a pull request before a human opens it. The difference is how much of your codebase they read before deciding what to say.
All 2 checked against the vendor's own pricing page · checked Sep 2026
Which should you pick?
Greptile indexes the whole repository first, so a comment can tell you a change breaks a caller it never touched. That is the argument for it, and it has a genuine free Starter tier, so you can point it at a repo and judge the comments yourself before paying. CodeRabbit is the broader product: a separate security offering at $40 and agent time billed by the minute rather than folded into the seat. Both land at $30 a month for the working tier, so price is not the deciding factor. Try Greptile first because trying it is free, and move to CodeRabbit if you want the security product or per-minute agent billing alongside review.
| Visit CodeRabbit | Visit Greptile | |
|---|---|---|
| What it costs | ||
| Pricing | Paid | Freemium |
| Pricing details | Per-developer plans: Essentials $30/month ($24 billed annually), Team $60/month ($48 annually), Advanced $90/month ($72 annually), each with a 14-day free trial. Enterprise is custom. The cloud agent is metered separately at $0.40 per agent minute. A free plan exists for open-source projects. | Free tier available - paid plan at $30 per seat per month including 50 credits per seat, with additional credits at $1 each - priced per seat rather than per pull request |
| Price range | $30 - $90/moChecked 2026-09-21 | $0 - $30/moChecked 2026-09-21 |
| Free option | Free trial only | Free tier |
| Plans |
|
|
| What it is | ||
| What it does | AI pull request review with a genuine free tier, per-user plans from $24 a month, and agent time that is billed by the minute rather than per review run. | AI pull request reviewer that indexes your whole repository first, so that its comments account for how a change interacts with code in other files too. |
| The details | ||
| Tags | reviewdebuggingbugfixpull-request | reviewdebuggingbugfixcode-review |
What it costs
- Pricing
- Paid
- Pricing details
- Per-developer plans: Essentials $30/month ($24 billed annually), Team $60/month ($48 annually), Advanced $90/month ($72 annually), each with a 14-day free trial. Enterprise is custom. The cloud agent is metered separately at $0.40 per agent minute. A free plan exists for open-source projects.
- Price range
- $30 - $90/moChecked 2026-09-21
- Free option
- Free trial only
- Plans
- Essentials$30/mo
- Team$60/mo
- Advanced$90/mo
- EnterpriseContact sales
What it is
- What it does
- AI pull request review with a genuine free tier, per-user plans from $24 a month, and agent time that is billed by the minute rather than per review run.
The details
- Tags
- reviewdebuggingbugfixpull-request
What it costs
- Pricing
- Freemium
- Pricing details
- Free tier available - paid plan at $30 per seat per month including 50 credits per seat, with additional credits at $1 each - priced per seat rather than per pull request
- Price range
- $0 - $30/moChecked 2026-09-21
- Free option
- Free tier
- Plans
- Starter$0/mo
- Pro$30/mo
- EnterpriseContact sales
What it is
- What it does
- AI pull request reviewer that indexes your whole repository first, so that its comments account for how a change interacts with code in other files too.
The details
- Tags
- reviewdebuggingbugfixcode-review
Read the full reviews
What each one is actually like to use, tested by hand rather than summarised from the vendor’s own page.
